ArticlePloS one2026
Structure-based discovery of a novel Granzyme A (GZMA) inhibitor for autism spectrum disorder through integrative transcriptomics, virtual screening, and long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Granzyme A (GZMA) is a trypsin-like serine protease expressed in cytotoxic lymphocytes that cleaves gasdermin B (GSDMB) to release a pore-forming N-terminal fragment, thereby inducing pyroptosis, a lytic and pro-inflammatory form of programmed cell death. This pathway has been implicated in immune dysregulation reported in a subset of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In this study, we reanalyzed the peripheral blood transcriptome dataset GSE26415 using an integrative computational framework comprising outlier-aware quality control, differential expression analysis, functional enrichment profiling, weighted gene co-expression network analysis, and protein-protein interaction network centrality scoring. These orthogonal evidence layers were integrated into a composite prioritization score, in which GZMA ranked first among candidate genes, followed by KLRK1 and KLRB1. Querying the Drug-Gene Interaction Database revealed no approved small-molecule inhibitors targeting GZMA, indicating that it remains pharmacologically undrugged. To explore druggability at the structural level, we performed structure-based virtual screening of a ZINC similarity library against the active site of GZMA (PDB ID: 1ORF). This yielded three drug-like candidates (T1, T2, and T3) with docking scores of -9.3, -9.1, and -8.9 kcal/mol, respectively, compared with -7.4 kcal/mol for the co-crystallized reference ligand (0G6). Each drug-protein complex and apo enzyme was studied in 500 ns molecular dynamics to verify the binding stability and conformational persistence compared to the unliganded protein. Among the screening compounds, T2 was able to occupy the catalytic pocket for the entire simulation, with a stable protein-ligand interaction and one low-energy conformational basin. T1, despite a better docking score, was able to detach from the pocket after around 400 ns, while T3 was able to do so in 50 ns. The overall order of binding persistence was T2 > T1 > T3. Collectively, these results prioritize GZMA as a key ASD-associated immune effector candidate and identify T2 as the most credible lead compound. Importantly, the findings underscore the limitation of docking scores alone and demonstrate that long-timescale molecular dynamics simulations and binding free energy are essential for distinguishing kinetically stable binders from transient docking poses. We note that GZMA was transcriptionally downregulated in peripheral blood; its selection rests on network centrality and on the premise that granzyme pathology is governed by enzymatic activity at tissue sites rather than by circulating transcript abundance, a mechanistic hypothesis to be tested at the activity level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.