ArticlePloS one2026
Operant House: A versatile open-source platform for automated operant conditioning testing of mice in home cages.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Operant conditioning is a powerful method for probing cognitive functions, yet its widespread use is constrained by low throughput, labor-intensive procedures, and high costs. Here, we developed "Operant House," a low-cost, programmable device equipped with a touchscreen, retractable levers, and a water-reward port, designed to enable automated operant conditioning with minimal experimenter intervention in individually housed mice within their home cages. Although individual home-cage testing requires careful attention to animal welfare, the system permits continuous monitoring through live camera observation and recorded videos. As proof of concept, we implemented two cognitive protocols: a delayed non-match-to-position (DNMTP) test for assessing working memory and a two-choice spatial discrimination (TCSD) test involving working-memory-related processes and behavioral flexibility. Because working memory impairment is one of the earliest clinical features of Alzheimer's disease (AD), we further applied these protocols to a knock-in mouse model carrying familial AD-associated amyloid precursor protein mutations (AppNL-G-F mice). Using this model, we detected significant working memory deficits as early as 5 months of age. At this age, we also detected subtle and spatially heterogeneous synaptic alterations in the prefrontal cortex, whereas conventional electrophysiological measures were largely preserved. Together, these findings highlight the Operant House as a cost-effective, scalable platform for assessing higher cognitive functions in mice, offering an accessible tool for investigating neurological and neuropsychiatric disease models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.