Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42868170›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Eye movements reflect capacity-dependent organization of working memory.

Qiaoli Huang, Christian F Doeller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qiaoli HuangMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4592-9270
Christian F DoellerMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human cognition is capacity-limited, requiring strategies to actively structure information. Eye movements offer a natural mechanism for sequential sampling, but whether such sequences reflect memory organization is unknown. We developed a working-memory task where color-frequency pairings created a latent ordinal structure to optimally reduce memory load. Across two experiments, gaze patterns spontaneously aligned with this structure. Participants sampled items following this sequence during encoding and revisited them during maintenance. Critically, the expression of this structure depended on cognitive demand. In a 3-item task, high performers showed robust sequential sampling during encoding, whereas lower performers compensated with replay-like revisitation during maintenance. Under higher demand (4 items), encoding-based organization was disrupted, and structured revisitation emerged primarily during maintenance. These findings suggest that eye movements provide an overt expression of an internally generated organizational process that flexibly adapts to cognitive demands, revealing a behavioral analogue to neural replay when encoding resources are strained.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsMemory, Short-TermCognitionFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.