ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
From molecular advances to limited clinical impact: The persistent gap in chromoblastomycosis.
Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChromoblastomycosis (CBM) is a chronic implantation mycosis of considerable morbidity, first described more than a century ago, predominantly affecting rural populations in tropical and subtropical regions. Although historically associated with impoverished settings, an increasing number of cases have been reported in both endemic and non-endemic areas, including high-income countries, reflecting an underrecognized epidemiological landscape. Despite its burden, key metrics such as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) remain undefined, as highlighted by recent global health initiatives. While advances in diagnosing and treating patients with CBM have been made, new technologies have not been incorporated into broader clinical and public health interventions. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsHerein, we synthesize recent advances in CBM, focusing on the expanding biodiversity of etiological agents driven by molecular taxonomy, the growing role of molecular diagnostics, and emerging therapeutic strategies. Novel genera and species have been identified, particularly among immunocompromised hosts, reshaping our understanding of host-pathogen interactions. Molecular tools, including PCR-based and genomic approaches, have improved species-level identification, although their availability remains largely restricted to reference centers. Therapeutically, extended-spectrum triazoles and terbinafine have shown the most consistent activity, while adjunctive immunomodulatory strategies, such as imiquimod, are emerging as promising alternatives. However, these advances sharply contrast with real-world clinical practice. In endemic settings, diagnosis continues to rely on low-cost conventional methods, which, given their sensitivity, should be more widely incorporated into public health screening and active case-finding strategies. Antifungal susceptibility testing lacks clear clinical correlation, and treatment decisions remain largely based on observational studies, in the absence of randomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: CBM exemplifies a neglected tropical disease in which substantial progress in basic science has not translated into improved patient outcomes. Strengthening public health strategies, expanding access to simple and effective diagnostic tools, and prioritizing implementation-focused research are urgently needed to bridge this persistent gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.