ArticleJournal of Parkinson's disease2026
Charting the future: A multi-setting medical chart study of advance care planning in Parkinson's disease and atypical Parkinsonism.
Article in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundAdvance Care Planning (ACP) enables people with progressive diseases to document and communicate future treatment preferences. For Parkinson's disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonism (AP), ACP is particularly important because of disease complexity, symptom burden, the progressive nature of the disease, and cognitive decline, yet its implementation across care settings remains unclear.MethodsWe conducted a medical chart review of 189 deceased patients with PD or AP who died in nursing homes (n = 91), hospitals (n = 58), or at home (n = 40) in the Netherlands. For patients who died at home, data were obtained from their general practice records. Data on treatment preferences, care discussions and palliative care goals were extracted at one year and six weeks before death.ResultsDocumentation of treatment preferences increased towards death but differed markedly between settings. Nursing homes recorded resuscitation and ICU limitations early and comprehensively, whereas hospitals made major updates only in the final weeks of life. In general practices, ACP documentation was limited. Nursing homes and hospitals more frequently addressed disease-specific scenarios, palliative sedation and end-of-life issues, while general practices more often reported preferred place of death and euthanasia. Palliative care goals in nursing homes covered all domains, while in hospitals and general practices they mainly related to physical aspects.ConclusionACP remains inconsistently documented and frequently delayed until the final weeks of life, when crises or cognitive decline may hinder meaningful participation. Earlier, iterative ACP-supported by clinician training, PD-specific guidance, and system-level measures such as ACP prompts in electronic medical records-could foster a more proactive and person-centered palliative approach aligned with patient values throughout the disease trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.