Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42868093›Full record

ArticleJournal of Parkinson's disease2026

Charting the future: A multi-setting medical chart study of advance care planning in Parkinson's disease and atypical Parkinsonism.

Herma Lennaerts-Kats, Bauke W Dijkstra, Anke Elbers, Bastiaan R Bloem, Marieke C Groot, Jenny T van der Steen, Marjan J Meinders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Herma Lennaerts-KatsDepartment of Primary and Community Care and Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud university medical center, Geert Grooteplein Noord 21, P.O. Box 9101 Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1182-8300
Bauke W DijkstraResearch Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6921-482X
Anke ElbersResearch Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bastiaan R BloemResearch Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marieke C GrootDepartment of Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour; Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders; Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jenny T van der SteenDepartment of Primary and Community Care and Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud university medical center, Geert Grooteplein Noord 21, P.O. Box 9101 Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marjan J MeindersResearch Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6491-7035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundAdvance Care Planning (ACP) enables people with progressive diseases to document and communicate future treatment preferences. For Parkinson's disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonism (AP), ACP is particularly important because of disease complexity, symptom burden, the progressive nature of the disease, and cognitive decline, yet its implementation across care settings remains unclear.MethodsWe conducted a medical chart review of 189 deceased patients with PD or AP who died in nursing homes (n = 91), hospitals (n = 58), or at home (n = 40) in the Netherlands. For patients who died at home, data were obtained from their general practice records. Data on treatment preferences, care discussions and palliative care goals were extracted at one year and six weeks before death.ResultsDocumentation of treatment preferences increased towards death but differed markedly between settings. Nursing homes recorded resuscitation and ICU limitations early and comprehensively, whereas hospitals made major updates only in the final weeks of life. In general practices, ACP documentation was limited. Nursing homes and hospitals more frequently addressed disease-specific scenarios, palliative sedation and end-of-life issues, while general practices more often reported preferred place of death and euthanasia. Palliative care goals in nursing homes covered all domains, while in hospitals and general practices they mainly related to physical aspects.ConclusionACP remains inconsistently documented and frequently delayed until the final weeks of life, when crises or cognitive decline may hinder meaningful participation. Earlier, iterative ACP-supported by clinician training, PD-specific guidance, and system-level measures such as ACP prompts in electronic medical records-could foster a more proactive and person-centered palliative approach aligned with patient values throughout the disease trajectory.

Indexed as

advance care planningatypical Parkinsonismend-of-life caremedical recordpalliative careParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID42868093
PMCPMC13661812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.