ArticleSpine deformity2026
Sagittal alignment following a modified Jackson technique in the surgical management of high-grade spondylolisthesis.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe optimal surgical management of paediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) remains controversial. Instrumented fusion in situ (IFIS) is considered low risk for neurological complications at the expense of limited correction of spinopelvic imbalance. This study evaluated radiographic outcomes of IFIS using a modified Jackson technique, with a focus on sagittal alignment and the evolution of spinopelvic balance over time.
methodsA retrospective review of 19 patients (< 18 years, mean age 13.7) with ≥ grade 3 HGS treated with IFIS using a modified Jackson technique between 2006 and 2022. Radiographic parameters including slip percentage, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, lumbosacral angle, and balance classification were analysed at baseline, 6 months, and 2 years post-operatively. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with vertical versus non-vertical sacrum morphology. Mixed-measures ANOVA determined changes across time points.
resultsImprovements in sagittal parameters were progressive, with more substantial changes observed at 2 years than at 6 months, suggesting gradual improvement over time. Significant improvements were observed in slip percentage (p < 0.001), sacral slope (p = 0.005), pelvic tilt (p = 0.016), lumbosacral angle (p < 0.001), and L5 incidence (p = 0.019). Patients presenting with a vertical sacrum showed greater increases in sacral slope and reduction in pelvic retroversion.
conclusionThe results of IFIS using a modified Jackson technique for paediatric HGS suggests significant partial improvements in key sagittal alignment parameters, including SS, PT, and LSA at 2-year follow-up. Whilst pelvic balance often remained incomplete at 2 years, ongoing radiographic improvement suggests a potential for further adaptation with longer follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42867771What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.