ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Impact of deep learning image reconstruction on CT radiomics reproducibility in patients with pulmonary nodules.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEnsuring CT feature reproducibility across imaging protocols and reconstruction algorithms is essential for the generalizability of radiomics applications. This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of CT radiomic features in pulmonary nodules using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) compared with conventional reconstruction techniques under different radiation doses. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe included 94 patients between March and June 2023. Standard- and low-dose CT images were scanned to assess the impact of dose reduction on feature reproducibility. DLIR strengths at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high (DLIR-H), representing progressive levels of noise suppression, were compared against filtered back projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V at 50% strength (ASIR-V-50%) reconstructions. 2264 features were extracted from pulmonary nodules. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and the coefficient of variation (CV) were used to evaluate inter-dose reproducibility, inter-reconstruction reproducibility, and feature variability.
resultsThe mean CCC for inter-dose reproducibility using DLIR-H, ASIR-V-50%, and FBP was 0.934 ± 0.104, 0.922 ± 0.128, and 0.922 ± 0.113, respectively (p = 0.055), with 29.8%, 27.9%, and 20.2% of features showing near-perfect agreement. In low-dose CT, DLIR-L achieved the highest inter-reconstruction reproducibility against ASIR-V-50% (0.950 ± 0.094), with 39.4% of features showing near-perfect agreement. The overall CV across reconstructions was 9.87 ± 20.32%, with 74.0% of features highly stable. Part-solid nodules showed the lowest variability (7.17 ± 13.48%, p < 0.001). Reproducibility improved significantly with increasing nodule size (p < 0.001).
conclusionDLIR improves the radiomic feature reproducibility in pulmonary nodules, making it particularly suitable for low-dose CT protocols. However, the robustness tends to decrease with higher DLIR strengths. Nodule characteristics significantly influence variability. KEY POINTS: Question The impact of DLIR on radiomic feature reproducibility across radiation doses and reconstruction methods in pulmonary nodules remains unknown. Findings DLIR-H demonstrated high inter-dose reproducibility, while DLIR-L achieved the highest inter-reconstruction reproducibility; feature variability decreased significantly with increasing nodule size, with 21 robust features identified. Critical relevance statementThis study critically assesses reconstruction-related instability in CT radiomics and identifies DLIR settings and nodule characteristics that influence feature robustness, supporting protocol optimization and more reliable quantitative pulmonary nodule assessment in clinical radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.