Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2026
Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06380244 (Opioid-free Anesthesia as an Alternative to General Anesthesia in Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Opioid-free Anesthesia as an Alternative to General Anesthesia in Abdominal Surgery
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia is standard in urological surgery, and there is additional interest in eliminating intraoperative opioids in prostate cancer surgery. Randomized evidence for opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is lacking. In this single-center randomized controlled trial, adult men undergoing RARP were allocated 1:1 to OFA (dexmedetomidine plus ketamine, no intraoperative opioids) or a remifentanil-based technique. Both groups received identical multimodal premedication, a bilateral quadratus lumborum block, sevoflurane maintenance and identical oxycodone patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The primary outcome was cumulative PCA oxycodone consumption over the first 24 postoperative hours. Prespecified secondary outcomes were pain (NRS), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), the demanded-to-delivered PCA bolus ratio, and perioperative changes in serum creatinine and white-cell count. A total of 149 patients were analyzed (OFA n=75, opioid-based n=74). Cumulative 24-h oxycodone consumption was lower with OFA (median 12.0 mg [interquartile range, IQR 6.0-22.0] vs 19.0 mg [10.5-34.0]; p=0.001), with a Hodges-Lehmann location-shift estimate of -6.0 mg (95% confidence interval, CI -10.0 to -2.0). Pain scores did not differ at any time point, and PONV was infrequent, with no significant between-group difference. Intraoperative hemodynamic adverse events (bradycardia, hypotension), perioperative white-cell count and serum creatinine did not differ between groups. In RARP delivered on a standardized multimodal and regional analgesic background, OFA reduced postoperative opioid consumption compared with a remifentanil-based technique, without a detectable difference in pain scores and with a similar safety profile.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06380244, registered 23 April 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.