Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42867719›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

MRI for restaging pancreatic cancer.

Giulia A Zamboni, Federica Omboni, Irene Panozzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giulia A ZamboniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Institute of Radiology, University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, Verona, Italy. giulia.zamboni@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5059-3305
Federica OmboniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Institute of Radiology, University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, Verona, Italy.
Irene PanozzoDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Institute of Radiology, University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a tumor with a dismal prognosis, as the majority of patients are diagnosed when the tumor is not resectable. Neoadjuvant treatment has significantly improved prognosis, but assessing treatment response can be challenging for radiologists. Given the fibrotic nature of the primary tumor, differentiating between residual viable tumor and fibrotic response can be difficult. MRI can have a role in reassessing the primary tumor and disease spread. In this review, we discuss MR techniques that can be used for this assessment, including routinely used sequences (e.g., DWI) and sequences that are not yet routinely included in pancreatic protocols (e.g., T1 mapping, ECV imaging, and USPIO contrast for nodal staging). KEY POINTS: Question Imaging assessment of the response of pancreatic adenocarcinoma to neoadjuvant treatment is difficult and still has limited accuracy. Findings Different MRI sequences and techniques have been suggested as possibly improving this assessment, reflecting on better patient management. Critical relevance statement We summarize the available evidence on MRI for restaging pancreatic carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatment.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyPancreatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID42867719
PMCPMC13661870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.