ArticlePsychological research2026
Perceptual awareness and motor expertise in the temporal dynamics of adaptation to unexpected tempo changes.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptation to unexpected tempo step changes may vary with perceptual awareness and motor expertise across the post-change time course. This study examined how trial-level Detection and motor expertise, operationalised as professional dance training, were associated with post-change adaptation. Two finger-tapping experiments used unexpected step changes from a 500-ms baseline inter-stimulus interval: near-threshold perturbations (± 10 ms) in Experiment 1 and supra-threshold perturbations (± 50, ± 100, and ± 150 ms) in Experiment 2. Forty adults completed Experiment 1 (21 dancers and 19 non-dancers), and 32 completed Experiment 2 (16 dancers and 16 non-dancers). Inter-tap interval (ITI), relative asynchrony (RA), and phase correction response (PCR) were analysed using linear mixed-effects models. In Experiment 1, Detection-related differences in continuation ITI and RA occurred primarily among non-dancers. In the + 10-ms deceleration condition (+Δt), the Detection-related PCR contrasts were opposite in direction between groups, but only non-dancers showed a reliable difference, with lower PCR in detected than in not-detected trials. In Experiment 2, both groups generally produced continuation ITIs close to the new target intervals. Expertise-related differences were selective and most consistently observed in RA in the - 100-ms acceleration condition (-ΔT), whereas PCR varied with perturbation direction and magnitude but did not differ between dancers and non-dancers. Perceptual awareness and motor expertise were associated with condition- and measure-specific patterns of adaptation to unexpected tempo step changes rather than a uniform adaptation advantage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42867688What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.