Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42867664›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Pectoral-branch entry-point anatomy and a standardised skeletonisation workflow for the pectoralis major island flap: an anatomical description and observational clinical analysis in adult chinese males.

Tao Li, Yidong Wu, Jialong Wu, Chao Zhang, Jing Zhou, Lifeng Li, Xiaohong Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tao LiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 678 Furong Road, Hefei Economic and Technological Development Zone, Hefei, Anhui, 230601, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7461-5575
Yidong WuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 678 Furong Road, Hefei Economic and Technological Development Zone, Hefei, Anhui, 230601, China.
Jialong WuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 678 Furong Road, Hefei Economic and Technological Development Zone, Hefei, Anhui, 230601, China.
Chao ZhangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 678 Furong Road, Hefei Economic and Technological Development Zone, Hefei, Anhui, 230601, China.
Jing ZhouDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 East Jiaomin Alley, Beijing, 100730, China.
Lifeng LiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 1 East Jiaomin Alley, Beijing, 100730, China. entllf@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0114-7608
Xiaohong ChenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 678 Furong Road, Hefei Economic and Technological Development Zone, Hefei, Anhui, 230601, China. trchxh@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3825-2647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo define the most distal entry point (MDEP) of the pectoral branch in adult Chinese males, integrate it into a standardised Landmark-Axis-Plane (LAP) skeletonisation workflow for the pectoralis major island flap, and describe its clinical performance under IDEAL Stage 2a.

methodsThe anatomical phase measured the MDEP in 20 formalin-fixed adult Chinese male cadavers (40 hemithoraces). The clinical phase analysed 194 males (skeletonised, n = 74; conventional, n = 120) treated contemporaneously by two surgical teams at a single centre using a target trial emulation framework with propensity-score overlap weighting and logistic regression with robust sandwich variance estimation. The primary endpoint was 30-day Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications. The technique and team were strictly collinear; all estimates are noncausal.

resultsThe MDEP lay 6.2-6.5 cm below the midclavicular point, predominantly at the third rib or third intercostal space. Severe complications occurred in 5 of 74 (6.8%) skeletonised patients versus 27 of 120 (22.5%) conventional patients (weighted OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.78, P = 0.016); flap necrosis was also lower (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.58). E-value analysis indicated that the primary association is vulnerable to moderate unmeasured confounding. QuickDASH data are descriptive only (62.8% of non-responders had died).

conclusionThe MDEP provides a reproducible bony-landmark reference for pedicle skeletonisation in adult Chinese males. The LAP workflow was associated with fewer severe complications, but strict technique-team collinearity and sensitivity to unmeasured confounding preclude a causal interpretation. Multicentre IDEAL Stage 2b validation is required.

Indexed as

Head and neck reconstructionIDEAL frameworkMost distal entry pointPectoralis major myocutaneous flapPedicle skeletonisation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.