Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42867659›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Middle ear cholesteatoma: biological basis, invasiveness heterogeneity, and challenges in severity assessment.

Qingqing Yao, Zhengang Zeng, Zhongxing Hu, Jun Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qingqing YaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Zhengang ZengDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China. zzg200114@163.com.
Zhongxing HuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Jun WangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMiddle ear cholesteatoma (MEC) is a benign but biologically aggressive middle ear lesion characterized by progressive and destructive bone erosion. However, current evaluation systems remain heterogeneous and focus on limited anatomical structures, leading to insufficient clinical predictive value. This review aims to integrate current evidence on the biological mechanisms of MEC-associated bone erosion and assessment systems, with the goal of informing the development of more standardized and clinically meaningful severity evaluation models.

methodsA narrative review was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases to summarize current knowledge on the mechanisms driving bone erosion in MEC and to evaluate the existing staging systems for assessing erosion severity. Keywords included "cholesteatoma", "bone erosion", "bone resorption", "molecular mechanisms", "staging systems" and related terms.

resultsAvailable evidence indicates that bone erosion in MEC arises from the interaction between hyperproliferative epithelium, chronic inflammation, and osteoclast activation mediated by cytokines and signaling pathways, particularly RANKL-related mechanisms. Existing staging systems are largely descriptive and exhibit significant heterogeneity, which collectively undermines their clinical utility in guiding surgical management or predicting patient outcomes.

conclusionCurrent staging systems, valuable for describing anatomical extension, fail to capture cholesteatoma's biological heterogeneity and invasive potential, thus incompletely depicting the disease. Future evaluation strategies should integrate molecular mechanisms, comprehensive anatomical involvement, and imaging findings to develop more standardized and clinically meaningful severity assessment systems.

Indexed as

Biological aggressivenessBone erosionInvasiveness heterogeneityMiddle ear cholesteatomaSeverity grading

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.