ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Improved assessment of the cochlear implant and temporal bone structures with ultra-high resolution photon-counting detector CT compared to conventional CT systems.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluates the image quality of photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) compared to conventional CT systems in cochlear implant imaging and aims to determine optimal scan parameters.
methodsThree cochlear implant models were inserted into three post-mortem human specimen heads. Each head was scanned on three high-end CT systems: SOMATOM Edge, SOMATOM Force and NAEOTOM Alpha. A total of 192 reconstructions were obtained, including various tube voltages (120-150 kV), tin filtering, and slice thicknesses (0.2-0.6 mm). For each scanner, multiple reconstruction kernels were applied. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for bone-to-soft-tissue were calculated. Two radiologists independently assessed anatomy, implant visibility, and overall image quality on a 5-point Likert scale and scored diagnostic confidence for detecting anatomic dehiscence.
resultsPCD-CT showed significantly higher image quality scores across implant, anatomy, and general image quality compared to the Edge and Force (p < 0.001). PCD-CT also produced significantly higher CNR (mean 23.5 vs. 13.8 [Edge] and 12.7 [Force]) and greater diagnostic confidence. For PCD-CT, optimal image quality was achieved using 0.2 mm slice thickness and the Hr89 kernel at 140 kV. PCD-CT scans acquired with half dose (27.5 mGy) showed no significant difference in CNRs but led to slightly lower subjective scores compared to standard-dose imaging.
conclusionPCD-CT provides superior image quality and diagnostic confidence in cochlear implant imaging compared to the Edge and Force. Optimal results are achieved using 140 kV, 0.2 mm slices, and the Hr89 kernel. Although dose reduction is feasible, it slightly compromises subjective image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42867657What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.