Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42867652›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Platelet-rich plasma for post-tonsillectomy pain, haemorrhage, and wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Mahmoud A Megahed, Hamzah M Alghzawi, Mohamed Rifai, Atef A Hassan, Osama Mohamed Refaat, Islam M Magdy, Bahaa-Eldeen Abozaid, Amr Ahmed Abedelbaky, Mohamed Eid Farag, John Wahba Tawfik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mahmoud A MegahedOtorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hamzah M AlghzawiSchool of Nursing, Tennessee State University, Nashville, TN, USA. h.alghzawi@vumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3569-6752
Mohamed RifaiFaculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shibin al Kawm, Egypt.
Atef A HassanFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Osama Mohamed RefaatOtorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Islam M MagdyDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Bahaa-Eldeen AbozaidOtorhinolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Amr Ahmed AbedelbakyDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Mohamed Eid FaragDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
John Wahba TawfikDepartment of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether intraoperative autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) reduces postoperative pain and haemorrhage and enhances wound healing after tonsillectomy, while critically evaluating the limitations that affect clinical translation and future applications.

methodsFive databases were searched through 3 July 2026 for randomized controlled trials comparing PRP with no PRP, placebo, or an untreated contralateral fossa. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and certainty using GRADE. Random-effects models with Hartung-Knapp adjustment were used for pain and healing outcomes; sparse haemorrhage outcomes were analysed using Mantel-Haenszel common-effect models with sensitivity analyses. Parallel-group and split-mouth trials were analysed separately.

resultsTwelve randomized trials including 723 patients were included, with 11 contributing quantitative data. PRP was associated with reduced pain on postoperative day (POD) 1 (MD -1.21, 95% CI -2.01 to -0.40) and POD 3 (MD -1.12, 95% CI -2.10 to -0.14), although effects were heterogeneous and transient. Primary haemorrhage showed a favourable common-effect estimate (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.80), but this was based on only 12 events and was not confirmed by random-effects sensitivity analysis. Complete healing did not significantly differ between groups (RR 1.34, 95% CI 0.59-3.06).

conclusionPRP may provide a modest early analgesic effect after tonsillectomy, but current evidence does not demonstrate a consistent improvement in haemostasis or mucosal healing. Future research should focus on standardized PRP characterization, patient-level comparative trials, and direct evaluation of whether PRP improves tissue regeneration compared with other biomaterial-based approaches.

Indexed as

Meta-analysisPlatelet-rich plasmaPostoperative painPost-tonsillectomy haemorrhageTonsillectomyWound healing

Identifiers

PMID42867652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.