Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42867649›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Determinants of auditory performance after cochlear implantation in post-lingual adults: beyond the duration of hearing loss.

Marta Caride, João Almeida

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marta CarideUnidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal. caridemarta@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7627-5548
João AlmeidaUnidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProlonged auditory deprivation progressively compromises central auditory pathway integrity, yet its prognostic impact in post-lingual adults undergoing cochlear implantation remains poorly defined. This study evaluates the influence of hearing loss duration - expressed in absolute terms, dichotomised by the conventional 10-year threshold, and as a proportion of lifetime with hearing loss - on auditory performance, and identifies the clinical determinants associated with the immediate activation effect and the post-implantation trajectory.

methodsSingle-centre, retrospective, observational study at Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, including 109 post-lingual adults undergoing CI between 2018 and 2024, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Auditory performance was assessed through pure-tone average, speech reception threshold, and speech discrimination score. Longitudinal modelling used linear mixed-effects models, distinguishing the immediate activation effect from subsequent temporal progression.

resultsPatients with longer hearing loss duration presented greater pre-implantation auditory impairment across all metrics, following a continuous dose-response relationship with no evidence of a threshold effect. The 10-year criterion showed no discriminative value - either in the immediate effect or in the post-implantation trajectory, which was equivalent between groups. Ear selection for implantation and pre-operative hearing aid status were the strongest determinants of the level reached at activation. The proportion of hearing loss duration covered by hearing aid use was the only predictor associated with superior longitudinal recovery in the speech metrics.

conclusionIn this cohort, duration of hearing loss did not identify patients who failed to benefit, and these single-centre data do not support its use as a stand-alone exclusion criterion for cochlear implantation. For most determinants, the functional differential established at activation was maintained throughout follow-up without compensatory catch-up, making optimisation of the level reached at activation the principal target of intervention. Individualised consideration of the ear to be implanted, maintenance of hearing aid use until the date of surgery, and maximisation of the proportion of hearing loss duration covered by hearing aid use constitute the main modifiable targets for intervention, and are associated with functional outcomes.

Indexed as

Auditory thresholdCochlear implantationDeafnessDisease durationSensorineural hearing lossSpeech perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.