ReviewTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026
Unlocking the future of crop improvement with crop wild relatives.
Review in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crop wild relatives (CWRs) retain extensive genetic diversity lost during crop domestication, yet their translation into breeding outcomes remains constrained by fundamental quantitative-genetic and population-genetic bottlenecks. Here, we propose an integrative framework that evaluates CWR deployment through three interconnected genetic lenses: (i) the architecture of domestication bottlenecks and their consequences for allelic diversity, linkage disequilibrium, and selectable genetic variation in modern breeding pools; (ii) the genetic determinants of successful allele transfer, distinguishing between loci with stable, reproducible breeding effects and those confined to proof-of-concept discovery; and (iii) the population-genetic limitations of emerging biotechnologies -- including pan-genome resolution, genome-editing precision, genomic-selection prediction accuracy, and de novo domestication scalability -- when applied to wild genetic backgrounds. By synthesizing population-genetic theory with empirical case studies across cereals, legumes, and Solanaceous crops, we identify critical translational gaps between genomic discovery and cultivar release, and outline testable genetic hypotheses to guide future CWR-based breeding. This review advances the field by shifting the discourse from technological potential to quantitative-genetic realism, providing breeders and geneticists with a mechanistic roadmap for prioritizing CWR resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42867633What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.