Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42867581›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

Ultrasonography in disaster medicine: a narrative review.

Félix Amiot, Karim Tazarourte, Guillaume Gorincour, Axel Benhamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Félix AmiotEmergency Department-SAMU50, Center Hospitalier Mémorial Saint-Lô, Saint-Lô, France. felix.amiot@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6774-9759
Karim TazarourteSAMU69-Urgence CHU Edouard Herriot, RESHAPE U1290 Université Lyon1, Lyon, France.
Guillaume GorincourMediterranean Institute for Medical Imaging in Gynecology, Obstetrics and Children, Marseille, France.
Axel BenhamedEmergency Department-Research Center, CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review aimed to critically appraise the diagnostic accuracy, clinical impact, and operational feasibility of ultraportable point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) across the four domains of disaster medicine. A literature search was conducted following the SANRA and PRISMA-trAIce guidelines. Records were identified through an AI-assisted literature-discovery tool (the Undermind Deep-Search platform, interrogating the Semantic Scholar corpus) run on 15 June 2025, rather than through an independent structured multi-database search. Candidate references were screened manually against pre-specified eligibility criteria by a single reviewer, with the search parameters independently verified by the senior author. Of 71 records identified, 63 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies comprised 32 original studies, 10 systematic or scoping reviews, 20 narrative or operational papers, and one guideline. In CBRN scenarios, lung ultrasound demonstrated sensitivities of 90-97% for COVID-19 pneumonia versus 60-69% for chest radiography while minimizing healthcare worker exposure. For blast and ballistic injuries, FAST showed a pooled sensitivity of 92.1% (95% CI: 87.8-95.6) and specificity of 98.7% (95% CI: 96.0-99.9) for intra-abdominal hemorrhage. In natural disasters, ultrasound altered management in up to 44% of patients. Post-disaster applications included vascular access, tube confirmation, and complication monitoring. Ultraportable POCUS demonstrates diagnostic utility and operational feasibility across multiple disaster domains. However, evidence quality varies significantly, and standardized protocols remain lacking. Prospective studies linking ultrasound deployment to improved patient outcomes are needed. KEY POINTS: Question When disasters disable conventional imaging, how does ultraportable point-of-care ultrasonography perform for diagnosis, triage, and procedural guidance across the four domains of disaster medicine? Findings Across 63 studies, FAST reached 92.1% pooled sensitivity for hemoperitoneum, lung ultrasound 90-97% versus 60-69% for radiography; management changed in up to 44%. Critical relevance statement This review critically appraises ultraportable ultrasound across all four disaster domains, showing that radiation-free bedside imaging accelerates triage, conserves scarce CT capacity, and extends radiological expertise through tele-guidance, while exposing an evidence base still lacking prospective outcome data.

Indexed as

Disaster medicinePoint-of-care systemsTelemedicineTriageUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42867581
PMCPMC13661852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.