ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Decoding functional cough in pediatrics: differentiating tic, psychogenic, and compulsive phenotypes for targeted intervention.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic cough without clear cardiopulmonary pathology poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in children and adolescents. While psychosocial factors play a crucial role in its pathogenesis, historical labels such as "habit cough" or "psychogenic cough" have often been vague and stigmatizing. Despite contemporary consensus guidelines advocating for the term "somatic cough syndrome," unified diagnostic criteria and standardized care pathways remain lacking. A rapid review approach was employed to search the PubMed database for empirical studies published between 2021 and May 2026 on chronic cough related to psychological factors, using terms including "psychogenic cough," "somatic cough," "habit cough," "somatic cough syndrome," and "tic cough." After screening 2134 records, 20 articles were included. The literature showed substantial heterogeneity in chronic cough presentations and provided complementary evidence regarding psychological morbidity, cough-related sensations and triggers, tic-like features, and behavioral treatment response. Most studies involved adults, and direct pediatric evidence was limited. Integrating these findings with established cough guidelines and relevant literature on tic, somatic symptom, and obsessive-compulsive disorders, we propose an evidence-informed tripartite framework comprising three candidate phenotypes: tic cough, psychogenic (somatic) cough, and compulsive cough. The framework emphasizes distinct sensory, affective, and cognitive-behavioral drivers and their implications for multidisciplinary management. Grounded in the clinical realities of pediatric general hospitals, this review provides a practical framework for non-mental health specialists, such as pulmonologists, to facilitate the early identification of psycho-behavioral drivers in functional cough. We call for a clinical paradigm shift from a passive "diagnosis of exclusion" to active "phenotypic identification," thereby promoting truly integrated, multidisciplinary management. What is Known: • Chronic cough without clear cardiopulmonary pathology may be associated with psychosocial factors. • Terms such as habit cough, psychogenic cough, somatic cough syndrome, and tic cough are inconsistently applied. What is New: • We propose a pediatric tripartite framework: tic, psychogenic (somatic), and compulsive cough. • This framework links distinct psycho-behavioral drivers to targeted multidisciplinary management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42867542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.