ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2026
Naturally disengaging control to reveal habits.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Naturally disengaging control to reveal habits.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Habits are an essential part of everyday decision making, yet the mechanisms underlying human habit formation and expression are difficult to study in laboratory settings, where participants typically engage strong goal-directed (GD) control that can mask habitual tendencies. Recent approaches have successfully elicited habits in long experiments by limiting the amount of GD control participants can exert (e.g., through forced response times). We extend this approach by designing a short behavioral paradigm that aims to induce and reveal habits without extrinsically limiting GD control, instead incorporating task features that we hypothesized would encourage participants to spontaneously relax GD control: a hierarchical multistep trial structure, opportunities for self-correction, and frequent switches between extensively and minimally practiced behaviors. Across seven experiments, we demonstrate that this approach induces habitual control in a relatively brief paradigm. Specifically, overtraining increases slips of action toward the extensively practiced context and reduces slips toward the minimally practiced one, indicating behavioral inflexibility at early response times, while slower responses remain dominated by GD control. Systematic manipulation of task features across experiments revealed that allowing multiple response attempts was particularly important for reliably observing this overtraining effect; a hierarchical trial structure may further facilitate habit expression, though this remains inconclusive. More broadly, our paradigm provides a practical tool for investigating how habits form and interact with goal-directed control. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.