ArticleJournal of vision2026
Decoding object categories from electroencephalography during free viewing reveals early information evolution compared to passive viewing.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Object processing is central to visual perception, and its neural substrates inform cognitive and computational models of vision. Electroencephalographic (EEG) research has increasingly adopted multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) to decode distributed neural representations, moving beyond average signal changes and predefined electrodes. Yet, most MVPA studies use passive viewing paradigms that constrain eye movements and evoke brain activity by external stimuli presentation, creating an artificial dissociation between perception and action. Here, we examine object category representations during active vision by combining MVPA with a deconvolution method for overlapping fixation-related responses. By decoding category information from single fixations, we compare the temporal dynamics of object processing between free viewing (active) and rapid serial visual presentation (passive) conditions. We find that categorical information, across multiple levels of abstraction, can be decoded from individual fixations during natural viewing, and that object representations generalize across passive and active conditions. Notably, representational dynamics time-locked to fixation onset emerge earlier than those time-locked to stimulus onset. We discuss the possibility that object processing begins parafoveally, aligned with saccade onset, rather than foveally at fixation. Thus, information about what and when to expect new information, available in free viewing, facilitates processing. These findings underscore the importance of studying vision in naturalistic settings and highlight key methodological considerations for combining MVPA with deconvolution in overlapping neural data. Object processing is fundamental to visual perception and to cognitive and computational models of vision. Although MVPA has advanced EEG research by enabling the decoding of distributed neural representations with high temporal precision, it has been applied primarily in passive viewing paradigms that constrain natural eye movements. The current study bridges the gap between passive and active vision research by combining MVPA with overlap deconvolution to decode object category information from EEG during natural fixations in free viewing. This approach reveals that category-specific representations emerge earlier in active viewing, likely reflecting processing that begins during saccade planning or execution. The findings underscore the importance of studying vision under ecologically valid conditions and introduce a novel methodological framework for capturing neural dynamics during active perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.