Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42867201›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026

Overview of Regulatory Guidelines Related to Methods and Models for Small Populations.

Laurens Sluijterman, Letao Li, Kristin E Karlsson, Vincent Damotte, Sarah Zohar, Kit Roes, Joanna IntHout

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laurens SluijtermanSection Biostatistics, IQ Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6964-6481
Letao LiInserm, Université Paris Cité, Inria, HeKA, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4692-9689
Kristin E KarlssonSwedish Medical Products Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-1166
Vincent DamotteInserm, Université Paris Cité, Inria, HeKA, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7321-8575
Sarah ZoharInserm, Université Paris Cité, Inria, HeKA, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8429-2340
Kit RoesSection Biostatistics, IQ Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6775-1963
Joanna IntHoutSection Biostatistics, IQ Health, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6127-0747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of approaches and related guidelines from the EMA, FDA, and ICH that are relevant for obtaining clinical evidence for small populations to support regulatory decision making. The approaches are grouped into three categories: (1) maximizing the attainable sample size, (2) adapting the trial design to deal with a small sample size, and (3) including external information, while also examining the role of modeling. Guidelines for clinical trials, guidelines specifically for small populations, as well as guidelines that include the use of modeling to support clinical evidence were included in the review. A recurring theme throughout the guidelines is the critical importance of the clinical context, affecting both the evidentiary standard and which approaches and models are acceptable. Two key gaps were identified: (1) guidance on Bayesian approaches is limited, and (2) there is no clear guidance on how to synthesize evidence across different modalities, such as trial results and Real-World Data, from both a practical and regulatory perspective.

Identifiers

PMID42867201
PMCPMC13660450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.