ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Efficient and scalable Python implementation of ANCOM-BC and ANCOM-BC2 for omics differential abundance testing.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summaryAnalysis of Compositions of Microbiomes with Bias Correction (ANCOM-BC) and its successor ANCOM-BC2 are critical algorithms for differential abundance analysis. Designed for handling compositional data, they feature the ability to estimate the unknown sampling fractions and correct the bias induced by their differences. While the original R package implementing the two methods is robust for standard dataset sizes, the increasing magnitude of modern multiomics studies presents computational challenges, often resulting in a runtime bottleneck for high-dimensional data. Here, we present native Python implementations of both ANCOM-BC and ANCOM-BC2 in the scikit-bio package, significantly accelerating the workflow and enabling their application to large-scale datasets. By leveraging vectorization with NumPy and numerical optimization in SciPy, we enhanced the efficiency of both methods without compromising their statistical accuracy. The benchmarking results revealed a dramatic increase in performance in both simulated and real datasets. We demonstrated that our Python implementations generated test results matching the original R code, while achieving 380- and 147-fold faster runtimes and 97.4% and 96.2% lower memory consumption on the largest tested dataset, respectively. The Python implementations allow for the analysis of datasets that are significantly larger than previously possible, and enable applications to alternative omics data types and complex statistical models that vary greatly by the number of samples, features, and covariates. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/scikit-bio/scikit-bio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42867151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.