ReviewCardiology journal2026
Recommendations on the use of a leadless dual-chamber pacemaker.
Review in Cardiology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leadless cardiac pacemakers (LPs) represent a significant advancement in cardiac pacing by eliminating the risks associated with traditional transvenous devices. Although single-chamber LPs have been in clinical use, the recent development of dual-chamber systems, such as AVEIR DR, offers synchronized atrial and ventricular pacing without the complications associated with transvenous hardware. Despite promising results, the widespread clinical adoption of dual-chamber LPs in Poland remains hindered by regulatory and reimbursement challenges. Although patients have access to single-chamber LPs, an unmet clinical need for dual-chamber LPs persists. Addressing this barrier is essential because dual-chamber LPs may optimize treatment by replacing two separate hospitalizations and implantations with a single procedure, thereby reducing the number of interventions and patient risk while lowering healthcare costs. This approach offers both clinical and economic benefits by improving efficiency and resource utilization in the healthcare system. This paper presents national experts' recommendations, supported by clinical research findings, on the use of dual-chamber LPs and solutions to increase their availability to patients in Poland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.