Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42867122›Full record

ReviewCardiology journal2026

Recommendations on the use of a leadless dual-chamber pacemaker.

Przemysław Mitkowski, Ludmiła Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz, Oskar Kowalski, Marcin Grabowski, Maciej Sterliński, Krzysztof Boczar, Krystian Josiak, Izabela Pieniążek, Jacek Walczak, Maciej Grys and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Przemysław MitkowskiPoznan University of Medical Sciences, 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan, Poland.
Ludmiła Daniłowicz-SzymanowiczDepartment of Cardiology and Electrotherapy Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Oskar KowalskiDepartment of Human Nutrition, Department of Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Marcin Grabowski1st Department and Clinic of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej Sterliński1st Department of Arrhythmia, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof BoczarDepartment of Electrocardiology, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Krystian JosiakCardiology Department, 4th Military Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland.
Izabela PieniążekArcana Institute, Krakow, Poland. izabela.pieniazek@certara.com.
Jacek WalczakArcana Institute, Krakow, Poland.
Maciej GrysArcana Institute, Krakow, Poland.
Jarosław StelmachowskiArcana Institute, Krakow, Poland.
Grzegorz MączyńskiGrzegorz Maczynski Law Firm (Science Legal), Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr PrzygodzkiDepartment of Health Economics and Reimbursement, Abbott Medical, Warsaw, Poland.
Mateusz Tajstra3rd Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leadless cardiac pacemakers (LPs) represent a significant advancement in cardiac pacing by eliminating the risks associated with traditional transvenous devices. Although single-chamber LPs have been in clinical use, the recent development of dual-chamber systems, such as AVEIR DR, offers synchronized atrial and ventricular pacing without the complications associated with transvenous hardware. Despite promising results, the widespread clinical adoption of dual-chamber LPs in Poland remains hindered by regulatory and reimbursement challenges. Although patients have access to single-chamber LPs, an unmet clinical need for dual-chamber LPs persists. Addressing this barrier is essential because dual-chamber LPs may optimize treatment by replacing two separate hospitalizations and implantations with a single procedure, thereby reducing the number of interventions and patient risk while lowering healthcare costs. This approach offers both clinical and economic benefits by improving efficiency and resource utilization in the healthcare system. This paper presents national experts' recommendations, supported by clinical research findings, on the use of dual-chamber LPs and solutions to increase their availability to patients in Poland.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacCardiac Pacing, ArtificialPacemaker, ArtificialEquipment DesignHumansPolandatrioventricular blockdual-chamberleadless pacemakerpacingsick sinus syndrome

Identifiers

PMID42867122
PMCPMC13671391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.