ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Distinct ways by which Srs2 helicase and Rrp1 translocase shape Rad51-DNA interactions in fission yeast.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precise regulation of homologous recombination is essential for genome stability. Multiple helicases and translocases prevent toxic, unscheduled association of the Rad51 recombinase with chromatin, and their levels are frequently dysregulated in cancer. It remains unclear how anti-recombinogenic enzymes act on distinct pools of Rad51. Using Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we show that the Srs2 helicase and Rrp1 translocase may target distinct Rad51 species through recombinase substrate specificity and activity control. Genetic analyses support a model in which Srs2 may preferentially regulate Rad52-dependent Rad51 nucleofilaments associated with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), whereas Rrp1 may preferentially regulate a distinct Rad51 population associated with double-stranded DNA. Accordingly, Rrp1 can alleviate the toxicity caused by Rad51 overproduction, a function not shared by Srs2. Unexpectedly, both loss and overproduction of Srs2 promote Rad51 accumulation, suggesting that excessive helicase levels may generate ssDNA substrates that promote Rad51 nucleation. Both Srs2 and Rrp1 fail to remove strand-exchange-deficient Rad51 from DNA. Both enzymes restrict Rad51 occupancy at centromeric regions, whereas only Srs2 acts within ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeats, revealing locus-specific regulation. Our findings support a model in which anti-recombinogenic enzymes differentially regulate Rad51 according to its DNA substrate, thereby contributing to a regulatory system that balances Rad51 functions during DNA repair across different genomic regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.