Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42866925›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2026

Development of an Improved Cadaveric Training Model for Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery Using Fresh-Frozen Cadavers.

Keito Shiozaki, Yutaro Sasaki, Katsuhito Hori, Marika Atagi, Ryota Nakanishi, Keisuke Hashimoto, Koki Tada, Fumiya Kadoriku, Takuya Yoshioka, Kyotaro Fukuta and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Keito ShiozakiDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-8442
Yutaro SasakiDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1953-0776
Katsuhito HoriDepartment of Urology, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.
Marika AtagiDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Ryota NakanishiDepartment of Urology, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7563-3852
Keisuke HashimotoDepartment of Urology, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.
Koki TadaDepartment of Urology, Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2431-1535
Fumiya KadorikuDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Takuya YoshiokaDepartment of Urology, Chubu Tokushukai Hospital, Okinawa, Japan.
Kyotaro FukutaDepartment of Urology, Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6204-0866
Yuichiro AtagiDepartment of Urology, Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8027-2716
Saki KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Ryoei MinatoDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Ryotaro TomidaDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2518-0197
Yoshito KusuharaDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Kunihisa YamaguchiDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Tomoya FukawaDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7806-3667
Hirofumi IzakiDepartment of Urology, Tokushima Prefectural Central Hospital, Tokushima, Japan.
Koichi TomitaDepartment of Anatomy and Developmental Neurobiology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.
Junya FurukawaDepartment of Urology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8974-9218

Funding

Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEndoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) is technically demanding and has a prolonged learning curve. Reports describing ECIRS training using fresh-frozen cadavers are limited, partly because intrarenal and pyelovenous backflow may prevent adequate hydronephrosis. This study aimed to establish an optimized ECIRS training model using fresh-frozen cadavers.

methodsECIRS cadaver surgical training (ECIRS-CST) was conducted between April 2021 and October 2022 and evaluated across two periods. In the first period, standard ECIRS-CST was performed. In the second period, laparoscopic nephrectomy training with renal vein clipping was performed before ECIRS-CST to suppress pyelovenous backflow. Achievement of each ECIRS step and overall procedural completion were recorded. Participants assessed procedural realism and educational value using a custom-designed 5-point Likert-scale questionnaire.

resultsNine sessions were conducted in the first period and four in the second. During the first period, ultrasound-guided nephrostomy puncture frequently failed because adequate hydronephrosis could not be established, and only three sessions progressed through all ECIRS steps. In the second period, renal vein clipping enabled more consistent hydronephrosis, resulting in successful nephrostomy puncture and completion of all steps in three of four sessions. Questionnaire responses indicated that tactile feedback during puncture, ultrasonographic visualization, and endoscopic findings were comparable to those in live patients. Many participants reported difficulty in achieving sufficient hydronephrosis during the first period.

conclusionsFresh-frozen cadavers provide a realistic environment for ECIRS training; however, pyelovenous backflow limits the creation of adequate hydronephrosis. Renal vein clipping effectively addresses this limitation and provides a more reliable training model for procedural training.

Indexed as

EndoscopyKidneyLaparoscopyNephrectomyCadaverHumanscadaver surgical trainingendoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS)nephrostomy puncturesurgical educationsurgical simulation

Identifiers

PMID42866925
PMCPMC13659635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.