ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2026
Low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: mechanisms, evidence, and translational perspectives-a narrative review.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is a chronic heterogeneous disorder characterized by persistent bladder-related pain, urinary symptoms, and substantial impairment in quality of life. Despite currently available multimodal treatment strategies, therapeutic outcomes vary among patients, highlighting the need to further investigate non-invasive approaches targeting inflammation, tissue repair, and sensory dysfunction. Low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been investigated as a non-invasive intervention with potential regenerative and neuromodulatory effects in IC/BPS. Its clinical relevance and translational applicability require further clinical validation. This narrative review summarizes the biological rationale, current clinical evidence, and translational considerations of low-energy ESWT in IC/BPS. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science Core Collection were searched for English-language studies published from January 1, 2010 to May 31, 2026. Relevant clinical, preclinical, and mechanistic studies were narratively synthesized. Key Content and Findings: Among 53 relevant publications, 13 original studies formed the main evidence base. Preclinical studies suggest that low-energy ESWT may affect inflammation, oxidative stress, urothelial barrier function, angiogenesis, and neural sensitization. Clinical studies, including randomized controlled trials and prospective investigations, have reported improvements mainly in pain-related outcomes among selected patient populations, whereas effects on symptom scores, voiding outcomes, bladder capacity, and long-term outcomes remain uncertain. Heterogeneity in protocols, patient characteristics, and outcome measures limits interpretation. Conclusions: Low-energy ESWT remains an investigational adjunctive treatment for IC/BPS, and current evidence is insufficient to support routine clinical use. Future studies should prioritize adequately powered, sham-controlled trials with standardized treatment protocols, prespecified phenotype stratification, harmonized outcome assessment, and longer follow-up to determine whether clinically meaningful and durable benefit exists and which patients, if any, are most likely to benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.