ReviewGland surgery2026
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration in parapharyngeal space lesions: a critical appraisal with illustrative cases.
Review in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parapharyngeal space (PPS) lesions represent a rare and heterogeneous group of deep neck entities whose diagnostic evaluation is often challenging because of their deep anatomical location and their close relationship with major neurovascular structures. Cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a central role in lesion characterization and anatomical localization. However, in selected cases cytological confirmation may be required to refine the differential diagnosis and guide clinical management. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration (FNA) may represent a minimally invasive diagnostic option when an adequate acoustic window and a safe percutaneous access corridor can be identified. Nevertheless, PPS sampling differs substantially from routine cervical FNA because of the anatomical complexity of the region and the potential proximity to major vascular structures. This article provides a critical appraisal of ultrasound-guided percutaneous FNA for PPS lesions, focusing on anatomical considerations, technical workflow, and decision-making in patient selection. Three illustrative cases from our institutional experience demonstrate how imaging finding and ultrasound assessment guide the decision-making process in performing - or avoiding - percutaneous sampling of PPS lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.