Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42866824›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2026

Channel attention of the image for distinguishing ductal carcinoma

Yu Yan, Yifei Qian, Yichen Xu, Lizhi Cao, Jingwu Ma, Runqiu Cai, Xiaowei Cai, Yi Zhang, Linjing Shi, Zhennan Lu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yu YanAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Naning, China.
Yifei QianAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Naning, China.
Yichen XuNanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Naning, China.
Lizhi CaoAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Naning, China.
Jingwu MaAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Naning, China.
Runqiu CaiAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Naning, China.
Xiaowei CaiAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Naning, China.
Yi ZhangAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Naning, China.
Linjing ShiAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Naning, China.
Zhennan LuAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Naning, China.
Yiyun WuAffiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Naning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is widely recognized as a precursor to invasive breast cancer, with an estimated 20-50% of cases progressing to invasive disease. The early detection of DCIS could save doctors and patients more time to deal with the breast cancer, which has posed a great threat to the life safety of women worldwide. This study aimed to develop a deep learning algorithm based on the image-level attention to distinguish DCIS from the benign mimics on ultrasound images, assisting doctors in screening for benign breast lesions. Methods: By screening the biopsy results of 3,327 patients, the ultrasound images of 612 patients were retrospectively collected, including DCIS and benign mimics. The dataset was randomly split at the patient level into training (70%, n=430) and test (30%, n=182) sets. Using ResNet18 as the backbone architecture, we compared and developed models with image-level attention mechanisms. Model performance was evaluated on the test set using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score. To assess the statistical significance of performance differences between models, the Holm-Bonferroni correction was employed to account for multiple comparisons. Results: Through quantitative comparison with 6 shallow benchmark algorithms such as AlexNet, VGG16, GoogleNet, ResNet18, CoAtNet and Swin Transformer, the effectiveness of our method was demonstrated, which achieved the best performance with AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision and F1-score of 0.868±0.009, 0.835±0.016, 0.767±0.056, 0.916±0.057, 0.916±0.059, 0.835±0.04, respectively. After Holm-Bonferroni correction, these improvements were statistically significant (corrected P<0.05) compared to all other models. The effect size of AUC, specificity, precision, F1-score were 0.69, 0.68, 0.89, 0.58, respectively, revealing large practical improvement. Furthermore, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (GradCAM) visualization confirmed that our model focused more accurately on lesion regions, providing interpretability for its superior feature extraction. Conclusions: In this paper, we proposed the ResNet18-CA for the classification of DCIS and confused cases, which was good at learning the ultrasound image features. The proposed network achieved higher accuracy than the other methods being compared.

Indexed as

Breast cancerconvolutional neural networks (CNN)ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)image channel attention (image CA)ultrasound image

Identifiers

PMID42866824
PMCPMC13657778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.