ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2026
Assessing spatial perception of learners during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has a steep learning curve. Specific educational efforts to improve HoLEP training has not been extensively studied. The aim of this study was to assess the spatial perception of urology residents (learners) HoLEP videos to improve future educational efforts. Methods: A cross-sectional simulation-based observational study during an academic urology conference was performed. A HoLEP recording was shown to resident physicians and paused at 5 time points. Resident physicians were then asked to mark down coordinates on diagrams of prostates in the coronal, axial and sagittal dimensions at each pause to denote where they perceived the laser was pointing. Results: Twenty-one urology residents (learners) participated in the study, of whom, 47.6% had prior HoLEP exposure. The learners plotted perceived coordinates at pre-designated time points in 3 dimensions throughout a HoLEP, totaling 315 coordinates. Learners perceived more accurately in the coronal dimension and were most accurate in identifying the verumontanum (the first time point of the procedure). Those with prior HoLEP exposure, as well as senior residents, were significantly more likely to accurately pinpoint the verumontanum in the coronal dimension (P=0.04, 0.03 respectively). Prior HoLEP exposure and post-graduate year (PGY)-level was not associated with accurately identifying the other time points in all dimensions. Conclusions: Spatial understanding during a HoLEP is challenging and learners are inaccurate in pinpointing coordinates while watching endoscopic recordings alone, regardless of PGY-level and prior HoLEP exposure. Learners appear to perceive in the coronal dimension more accurately as opposed to the axial or sagittal dimensions. This could be used to direct future educational efforts for teaching HoLEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.