ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Current applications of transauricular vagus nerve stimulation in orthopedics: a narrative review of the literature.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique with emerging applications in various medical fields. While its role has been explored in neurological, psychiatric, and inflammatory conditions, its potential in orthopedics has not been reviewed in depth. Our objective was to synthesize current evidence on the use of taVNS in orthopedic conditions. Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for articles published between January 2010 and July 2025 using the terms "transcutaneous" AND "vagus nerve" AND "stimulation." Seventeen eligible studies were identified after applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Randomized controlled trials were assessed for methodological quality using the Risk of Bias 2 tool. Results: Seventeen studies addressed the orthopedic applications of taVNS for chronic low back pain, neck pain, knee osteoarthritis, and in perioperative settings. Across the included studies, taVNS was associated with reductions in pain intensity, although superiority over control interventions was not consistent across trials; additional potential benefits were reported for sleep quality, disability indices, and psychological measures. In perioperative contexts, high-quality randomized trials demonstrated reductions in postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. However, methodological heterogeneity, small sample sizes, and inconsistent stimulation protocols limit the strength of the conclusions. Discussion: taVNS is a safe, accessible, and promising adjunctive therapy for pain management in orthopedics, with potential applications in both chronic and perioperative settings. Larger, high-quality trials are required to establish standardized protocols and clarify clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.