ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Complex sclerosing lesions of the breast mimicking carcinoma: diagnostic pitfalls and the decisive role of immunohistochemistry.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complex sclerosing lesion (CSL) of the breast is a benign proliferative condition that frequently mimics invasive carcinoma on imaging and in limited biopsy specimens. Radiologic-pathologic discordance may result in diagnostic uncertainty and potentially unnecessary surgical intervention. Accurate pathological assessment, particularly evaluation of myoepithelial cell preservation, is therefore critical to appropriate clinical decision-making. Methods: A retrospective analysis of three female patients diagnosed with CSL at a single medical institution was conducted, along with a focused review of the literature. Clinical presentation, multimodal imaging findings, core-needle biopsy results, histopathological features, immunohistochemical profiles, diagnostic challenges, and subsequent management strategies were systematically evaluated. Results: All three lesions demonstrated imaging features highly suspicious for malignancy on ultrasound, mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Core-needle biopsy yielded inconclusive or misleading results, including atypical ductal proliferation and suspected invasive carcinoma, prompting surgical excision. Final pathological examination confirmed CSLs in two patients and breast secretory carcinoma in one patient. Immunohistochemical analysis - particularly the assessment of myoepithelial markers such as p63 and calponin - played a decisive role in distinguishing benign CSL from invasive disease. No recurrence or disease progression was observed during follow-up. Conclusions: CSLs represent a well-recognized diagnostic pitfall in breast practice due to their close resemblance to carcinoma on imaging and in limited biopsy samples. Comprehensive histopathological evaluation, supported by appropriate immunohistochemistry, is essential to establish an accurate diagnosis, guide surgical decision-making, and avoid overtreatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.