Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42866757›Full record

ReviewIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research

Effectiveness of Negative Pressure Wound Therapies on the Healing Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Asmat Burhan, Chrisnawati, Desty W Alfons, Septian M Sebayang, Suci Khasanah, Aloysia Ispriantari, Rahmad Wahyudi, Vijay Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Asmat BurhanSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Universitas Harapan Bangsa, Indonesia.
ChrisnawatiSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia.
Desty W AlfonsProdi Studi Diploma III Keperawatan Merauke, Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Jaya Pura, Indonesia.
Septian M SebayangSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Universitas Harapan Bangsa, Indonesia.
Suci KhasanahSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Universitas Harapan Bangsa, Indonesia.
Aloysia IspriantariFaculty of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.
Rahmad WahyudiSekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Ngudia Husada Madura, Bangkalan, Indonesia.
Vijay KumarWound and Ostomy Care Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a technology-based modality therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers used by nursing. However, there are variations in its effectiveness among patients, which requires further research to better understand. This systematic study investigated the effect of NPWT on the healing of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). Material and Methods: The databases consulted were CINAHL, ProQuest, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Wiley, with a date range restriction from September 2003 to July 2022. The inclusion criteria were full-text articles with a randomized controlled trial design and English publication. They were using comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) version 3.3.070 software to conduct a meta-analysis. Results: There were 1.375 participants in 14 trials, and residual heterogeneity analysis indicated wound healing I-squared (I Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that NPWT administered by nurses improves wound healing in DFU patients. Regarding infection control, this study did not produce statistically significant results.

Indexed as

Diabeticfoot ulcermeta-analysisnegative pressure wound therapieswound healing

Identifiers

PMID42866757
PMCPMC13657640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.