ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Outcomes of renal transplantation in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although transplantation is considered a treatment for end-stage renal disease, data on post-transplant outcomes remain fragmented. Objective: This study aims to assess the outcomes of renal transplantation in Africa. Design: Studies were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Google Scholar, the Transplantation Library, and African Journals Online. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the pooled effect size of each outcome. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Studies: Studies conducted in Africa. Participants: In this study, 16 articles were included, with a total of 3617 participants. Result: Pooled mortality among renal transplant recipients was 14.3% (95% CI: 8.77%-19.84%). Graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 91.74% (95% CI: 88.56%-94.93%) and 69.15% (95% CI: 57.39%-80.91%), respectively. Patient survival at 1 and 5 years was 94.72% (95% CI: 92.17%-97.26%) and 81.26% (95% CI: 72.11%-90.4%), respectively. Diabetes mellitus, delayed graft function, acute rejection, and infection were observed as post-transplantation complications. Conclusion: With a few important exceptions, both graft and patient survival were comparable to reports from other nations. Thus, we recommend that clinical practitioners prioritize infection prevention and early screening for complications. Furthermore, policymakers should develop and implement strategies to prevent and screen for post-transplant complications, and improve the accessibility of the service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.