ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
When dengue is not the answer: diagnostic anchoring bias in febrile illnesses in conflict-affected settings.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue is an increasingly prevalent arboviral infection in tropical regions, with expanding geographic distribution and rising reports of atypical and severe manifestations, including neurological involvement. In endemic and resource-limited settings, particularly those affected by conflict, the widespread availability of rapid diagnostic tests and overlapping clinical presentations with other infectious diseases have led to a growing concern: diagnostic anchoring bias toward dengue. This bias may contribute to misdiagnosis, delayed treatment of alternative life-threatening conditions, and distorted public health data. This commentary highlights key diagnostic pitfalls, including coinfections, incidental dengue positivity, and neurological mimics, and proposes a pragmatic clinical approach to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.