ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Hybrid Explainable Deep Ensemble Framework with self-attention mechanism for early prediction of depression severity using PHQ-9 clinical and behavioral data.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression is a major global mental health disorder that requires accurate, reliable, and interpretable prediction models to support early identification and timely intervention. This study proposes a Hybrid Explainable Deep Ensemble Framework for multiclass prediction of depression severity using PHQ-9 clinical responses and behavioral characteristics. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional machine learning study was conducted using a dataset comprising 682 anonymized participants. Predictor variables included demographic characteristics, PHQ-9 questionnaire items, sleep quality, academic pressure, and financial pressure. A hybrid ensemble integrating TabNet, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and XGBoost was developed with a self-attention mechanism for adaptive feature weighting and a weighted soft-voting strategy for final prediction. Model performance was evaluated using five-fold stratified cross-validation and an independent test set. Accuracy, precision, recall, macro F1-score, ROC-AUC, Matthews correlation coefficient, confusion matrix analysis, and SHAP-based explainability were employed to assess predictive performance and model interpretability. Results: The proposed framework achieved an overall accuracy of 91.3%, precision of 0.907, recall of 0.898, macro F1-score of 0.902, and a macro-ROC-AUC of 0.940, outperforming the baseline machine learning models. Class-wise evaluation demonstrated the strongest performance for severe depression (F1-score = 0.934), whereas the mild depression category exhibited comparatively lower predictive performance (F1-score = 0.861) because of overlap with adjacent severity levels. Confusion matrix analysis indicated that misclassification primarily occurred between neighboring depression categories while clinically implausible predictions were rare. SHAP analysis identified sleep disturbance (PHQ-4), fatigue (PHQ-3), academic pressure, depressed mood (PHQ-2), and financial pressure as the most influential predictors. The ablation study further demonstrated that incorporating the self-attention mechanism and ensemble learning strategy improved both predictive performance and model robustness. Conclusion: The proposed Hybrid Explainable Deep Ensemble Framework combines high predictive accuracy with transparent decision-making for multiclass depression severity assessment. By integrating deep learning, ensemble learning, self-attention, and explainable artificial intelligence, the framework provides accurate and clinically interpretable predictions and represents a promising approach for future clinical decision-support systems and precision mental health screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.