Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42866698›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

A Systematic Review of Spaced Repetition, Retrieval Practice, and Academic Performance in Undergraduate Medical Students.

Nathan K Luu, Scott Severance

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nathan K LuuEducation, Liberty University, Lynchburg, USA.
Scott SeveranceMedical Education, Liberty University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Lynchburg, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spaced repetition and active retrieval practice are learning strategies designed to improve long-term memory retention. These approaches target the forgetting curve, which describes the progressive loss of information over time unless learners actively recall and review material at spaced intervals. Modern learning platforms such as Anki and Quizlet use scheduled review and retrieval to strengthen memory consolidation and recall, and their use in undergraduate medical education has increased in recent years. This systematic review aimed to determine whether spaced repetition and active retrieval interventions improve memory retention and examination performance among undergraduate medical students. The review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, ERIC, and Scopus were searched for studies examining spaced repetition or retrieval practice in undergraduate medical students, and studies reporting objective academic outcomes were included. Of 314 records identified, 210 remained after duplicate removal, and 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. Due to heterogeneity in study designs, interventions, and outcome measures, a narrative synthesis was undertaken, and no meta-analysis was performed. Most controlled studies reported improvements in examination performance or knowledge retention following spaced retrieval interventions. Observational studies of self-directed flashcard use reported mixed findings. Several demonstrated positive associations with academic performance, whereas others, including studies that measured platform use objectively rather than by self-report, found no association. These findings were more susceptible to self-selection bias and confounding, and most were judged to be at serious risk of bias. Several studies suggested greater benefit with sustained and longitudinal engagement. Overall, the available evidence suggests that spaced repetition and active retrieval practice may improve academic outcomes in undergraduate medical education, particularly when implemented longitudinally through structured retrieval. Controlled studies provided stronger support for these benefits, whereas evidence from observational studies of self-directed Anki use was weaker because of potential selection bias and confounding. Future research should focus on standardized implementation strategies and longer follow-up to determine whether early use of spaced retrieval produces durable benefits during clinical training and on future examinations.

Indexed as

active recallankianki flashcardsspaced repetitionspaced repetition flashcards

Identifiers

PMID42866698
PMCPMC13657408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.