ArticleThe journal of climate change and health
Advancing climate and health policies in Kenya: Insights from national policy stakeholders.
Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Climate change is increasingly recognized as one of the most critical determinants of global public health. The intersection of climate and health requires urgent attention if the impacts of climate change on health are to be mitigated Materials and methods: This study aimed to answer this question by conducting interviews with 21 high-level stakeholders working on climate change, health, and related policy areas in the months of April to July 2024. Data gathered from the interviews was supplemented by climate change and health literature. Results: Nearly all respondents agree that climate change and health policy should be explicitly integrated. This integration could enhance the use of financial resources, amplify co-benefits, and simplify the management of the two issues. Integration is, however, barred by the siloed nature of working and limited collaboration within these sectors, limited funding and data access, a shortage of skilled personnel, lack of political goodwill, and weak institutionalization of innovative ideas. To encourage integration, respondents identified interventions such as increased advocacy, public awareness campaigns, and international efforts focused on climate and health solutions. For improved collaboration, several suggestions including establishing cross-sector partnerships, conducting joint research, building capacity, and implementing holistic approaches like the One Health Model, were proposed. Interpretation: The findings from this study reveal that, although the national climate and health policy remain integrated to some degree, there exists several avenues and benefits of deepening the linkage. This study, therefore, provides a discussion on the potential implications of the findings for health and climate professionals, advocacy groups, researchers, government, the private sector, donors, and legislators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.