ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2026
Recent Advances in Mitochondria-Targeted Delivery Strategies for Ischemic Stroke Therapy.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic stroke remains a leading cause of death and disability, and mitochondrial dysfunction links bioenergetic failure, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier (BBB) injury, and cell death. Despite extensive preclinical neuroprotection research, translation has often failed because candidate interventions show inadequate brain exposure and mitochondrial target engagement, are tested under pretreatment or simplified experimental conditions, emphasize short-term infarct reduction rather than durable functional recovery, and are difficult to integrate with time-critical reperfusion care. This Review analyzes mitochondria-targeted delivery as a sequential cascade spanning systemic stability, BBB or nose-to-brain entry, lesion and cell selection, endosomal escape, mitochondrial access, and functional rescue. We compare brain-targeted, intranasal, biomimetic, and organelle-transplantation platforms; place recent examples alongside established mitochondria-targeted antioxidant and mitochondrial-transfer literature; and distinguish localization evidence from causal mitochondrial recovery. The most tractable next steps are a standardized, disease-relevant validation framework and simplified delivery designs compatible with acute stroke workflows. Translational success will require integrated systems that address the complete sequential delivery cascade with the minimum necessary complexity, reproducible manufacturing, clinically relevant treatment windows, and long-term functional and safety endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.