Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42866598›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Music in the Operating Room: Impact on Team Communication, Focus, and Monitoring Patient Safety.

Lillian N van Biljon, Zander N Miller, Carsen Steele, Alleana Corpin, Elizabeth R Merwin, Joseph Keebler, Gary Sutkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lillian N van BiljonDepartment of Surgery, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Zander N MillerDepartment of Human Factors and Behavioral Neurobiology, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, USA.
Carsen SteeleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Alleana CorpinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.
Elizabeth R MerwinDepartment of Human Factors and Behavioral Neurobiology, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, USA.
Joseph KeeblerDepartment of Human Factors and Behavioral Neurobiology, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, USA.
Gary SutkinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, USA.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS029508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Music is commonly played in the operating room (OR), yet excessive noise is a known contributor to miscommunication and surgical errors. This study examined how music choice and surgical phase influence surgical team members' perceptions of concentration, communication, and patient safety among OR staff. Methods A survey was administered via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) in person, by email, and over Zoom to surgeons, nursing staff, and anesthesia providers. Questions addressed music preferences, who selects the music, and perceived effects during routine versus complex phases of surgery. Responses were analyzed by age and role using chi-squared tests. Results Response rate was 63.6%. Among 138 respondents (61 surgeons, 40 nursing staff, 37 anesthesia providers), 34.8% (n=48) preferred music at all times, and 10.9% (n=15) preferred none. Music preferences spanned 44 genres, five of which were commonly perceived as disruptive. Although 70.3% (n=97) reported mood benefits, 33% (n=37) reported impaired communication, 8% (n=11) impaired concentration, and 11.6% (n=16) impaired patient safety monitoring. Only 9.4% (n=12) of respondents selected the music; 75% (n=9) of these were attending surgeons (p<0.001), and most did not solicit team preferences. Two-thirds (66.2%; n=49) reported that music appropriateness depended on surgical phase, particularly during high-focus tasks such as counts. Conclusion While music is generally favored in the OR, it is centrally controlled and may negatively affect critical aspects of teamwork and safety. Greater awareness of surgical phase and shared decision-making around music selection may improve communication, team dynamics, and patient safety.

Indexed as

communicationinterprofessional teamworkmusicoperating roomspatient safety

Identifiers

PMID42866598
PMCPMC13657013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.