ReviewAnnals of intensive care2026
Comparison of the approaches to combine Renal Replacement Therapy with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - a Scoping Review.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used for cardiac and respiratory failure and is associated with high rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) and fluid overload requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). ECMO and RRT can be run independently in parallel, or RRT hemofilter or device can be integrated into the ECMO circuit. Several parallel and integrated ECMO-RRT configurations have been described, but the optimal approach remains uncertain.This scoping review mapped the available literature comparing at least two ECMO-RRT configurations, summarized reported outcomes, and identified knowledge gaps. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov without restrictions, with the final search conducted on February 9, 2026. Eligible studies compared at least 2 ECMO-RRT configurations linked to reported outcomes. Data on study characteristics, configurations, outcomes, and anticoagulation were extracted and synthesized. Results: Of 6,806 records, 20 studies were included: 12 were clinical including 1 randomized controlled trial, 3 in vitro, 1 in silico, and 4 surveys. More than 8 ECMO-RRT connection schemes have been described by clinical studies since 2013. No consistent differences in efficiency or clinical outcomes were observed between the configurations compared. Integrated methods were associated with longer or comparable hemofilter lifespan. Surveys confirmed heterogeneous medical practices, and 2 safety concerns (unstoppable pressure alarms and air embolism) were reported. Conclusion: Evidence on ECMO-RRT configurations is limited and heterogeneous. Future systematic and rigorous comparison of all the configurations through preclinical and clinical studies is needed to harmonize medical practices and inform the development of guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.