Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42866584›Full record

ArticleISME communications2026

A novel

Judith Piontek, Thomas Schott, Patricia Roeser, Jens Kallmeyer, Michael Ernst Böttcher, Christiane Hassenrück, Klaus Jürgens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Judith PiontekDepartment of Biological Oceanography, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Seestr. 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3857-8206
Thomas SchottDepartment of Biological Oceanography, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Seestr. 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3989-926X
Patricia RoeserGeochemistry & Isotope Biogeochemistry, Department of Marine Geosciences, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Seestr. 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5604-1827
Jens KallmeyerGFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences, Section Geomicrobiology, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-1140
Michael Ernst BöttcherGeochemistry & Isotope Biogeochemistry, Department of Marine Geosciences, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Seestr. 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-0303
Christiane HassenrückDepartment of Biological Oceanography, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Seestr. 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1909-1726
Klaus JürgensDepartment of Biological Oceanography, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Seestr. 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7999-9368

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sandy sediments of the coastal ocean are generally not considered a habitat for highly active sulfate-reducing microorganisms (SRM) due to fluctuations in oxygen concentrations and carbon availability. This study investigated the taxonomic composition and gene expression patterns of sulfate-reducing communities in both sandy, organic-poor sediments and muddy, organic-rich sediments in the mesohaline southern Baltic Sea. Our results revealed that a novel order-level lineage within the class

Indexed as

Baltic Seamarine sedimentsmetatranscriptomessulfate reductionThermodesulfovibrionia

Identifiers

PMID42866584
PMCPMC13657043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.