ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Associations of height-for-age and BMI-for-age
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric urolithiasis is an increasing public health concern in high-prevalence regions, but the relationship between child growth status and the odds of stone disease remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the associations of height-for-age Methods: This hospital-based retrospective multicenter case-control study included 14,027 children aged <15 years, comprising 2,180 children with imaging-confirmed renal and/or ureteral stones and 11,847 controls without urolithiasis. HAZ and BAZ were calculated according to World Health Organization growth standards and references. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between HAZ, BAZ, and urolithiasis after adjustment for sex, ethnicity, age, and study center. Restricted cubic spline models were used to examine dose-response and nonlinear relationships, and subgroup analyses were performed by study center, sex, ethnicity, age group, and nutritional status. Results: Children with urolithiasis had lower HAZ and BAZ than controls (HAZ: -0.79 (-1.74, 0.24) compared with 0.57 (-0.29, 1.41); BAZ: -0.25 (-1.19, 0.77) compared with 0.36 (-0.61, 1.43); both Conclusion: Lower HAZ and BAZ were associated with higher odds of pediatric urolithiasis, with HAZ showing a stronger and nonlinear association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.