ArticleMethodsX2026
Implementation and validation of a clinically compatible four-shell diffusion MRI protocol for ischemic stroke research.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced multi-shell diffusion MRI enables microstructural modeling beyond conventional tensor metrics but remains underutilized in clinical stroke research. Within the multicenter RESSTORE clinical trial, we implemented a clinically compatible four-shell diffusion protocol optimized for 3T scanners (10-minute acquisition time) and developed a fully reproducible open-source processing pipeline, implemented within a BIDS-compatible framework, including preprocessing, diffusion tensor modeling, NODDI fitting, tractography, tractometry, and atlas-based extraction. The protocol was first evaluated in twelve healthy volunteers (HV), including a test-retest reliability assessment in six participants. It was subsequently applied in twelve patients 7 days after ischemic stroke. Microstructural metrics including FA, ODI and NDI were compared between stroke patients and HV to assess acquisition and processing pipeline feasibility and to evaluate the metric-specific ability to detect lesion-related microstructural alterations. Reliability metrics demonstrated stable parameter estimation for ODI, FA and NDI. Interhemispheric and between-group comparisons revealed significant differences for ODI and FA, whereas NDI, despite good reliability, did not show significant differences between HV and stroke patients in this dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.