ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026
Response pathways and clinical workflow integration of digital symptom management platforms for breast cancer: A scoping review.
Review in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study systematically reviewed evidence on the operational pathways and workflow integration of digital symptom management platforms for breast cancer, covering the full process from monitoring to intervention. It summarized response pathway patterns to inform oncology nursing practice. Methods: Following the Arksey and O'Malley scoping review framework, we systematically searched seven databases from January 1, 2010 to August 7, 2026. The PCC (Population, Concept, Context) principle was adopted to formulate the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Indicators related to operation and implementation were extracted. Results: A total of 19 publications representing 18 independent studies and 18 unique digital platforms were included. Only a few studies reported implementation details such as data integration with hospital information systems, response time, referral escalation, staff training, and process safety. According to whether clinicians participated in symptom management workflows, we classified the included platforms into two mutually exclusive categories: the clinician-involved pathway ( Conclusions: Key implementation elements of current digital symptom management platforms for breast cancer, such as system integration and response timeliness, remain insufficiently reported. We established an exploratory classification framework comprising two mutually exclusive categories-the clinician-involved pathway and the patient-alone pathway-which may serve as a reference for oncology nursing practice. Future efforts should establish a standardized reporting framework and conduct cross-setting implementation studies to evaluate the applicability and sustainability of these implementation models. Review registration: The study protocol is registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF Registry ID: 10.17605/OSF.IO/QPHV3).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.