Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42866513›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026

CSF drainage strategy and complication management of hydrocephalus.

Chunsheng Xia, Zhixiong Lin, Xiangpin Wei, Hao Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chunsheng XiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Zhixiong LinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiangpin WeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Hao XuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: Conventional CSF drainage strategies-using external ventricular drainage (EVD) for acute hydrocephalus and permanent shunts (ventriculoperitoneal [VP], ventriculoatrial [VA], lumboperitoneal [LP]) for chronic hydrocephalus-are often inadequate in complex clinical scenarios (e.g., patients with intracranial hemorrhage, active infection, or unstable conditions who cannot undergo permanent shunt surgery). This creates an urgent need to comprehensively review drainage modalities to address the core challenge of reducing surgical frequency while effectively controlling intracranial pressure (ICP) and avoiding complications. Methods: This review systematically examines seven major CSF drainage methods: EVD, lumbar drainage (LD), Ommaya reservoir EVD, long-tunneled EVD (LTEVD), VP shunt, VA shunt, and LP shunt. It details each method's indications, contraindications, advantages, disadvantages, and typical application duration based on clinical evidence and literature. Additionally, the review covers key aspects of external drainage management and targeted strategies for handling common complications. Expected outcomes: This review aims to provide neurosurgeons with a practical, evidence-based reference for selecting optimal CSF drainage strategies. It also proposes a stepwise clinical protocol to guide decision-making-from initial intervention for acute hydrocephalus to transition to long-term or permanent drainage solutions-with the goal of balancing reduced surgery numbers, effective ICP control, and complication prevention to improve patient prognosis. Discussion: A practically feasible protocol with preliminary clinical evidence is proposed: initiate EVD for acute hydrocephalus; for shunt-dependent patients, use LD for communicating hydrocephalus or Ommaya reservoir EVD for obstructive hydrocephalus; if permanent shunts remain unfeasible after re-evaluation, switch to LTEVD; and finally transition to appropriate permanent shunts when conditions permit. This protocol optimizes drainage strategies, addresses gaps in traditional approaches, and supports neurosurgeons in personalized treatment selection.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsDrainageHydrocephalusPostoperative ComplicationsHumanscerebrospinal fluid drainagecomplication managementexternal ventricular drainagehydrocephalusventriculoperitoneal shunt

Identifiers

PMID42866513
PMCPMC13656400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.