ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2026
Integrating Oral Health Into Occupational Therapy: Knowledge, Practices, Barriers and Facilitators-A Systematic Review.
Review in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral health is essential for overall wellbeing and daily functioning, yet its integration into occupational therapy remains limited. Despite the profession's potential to promote oral health through person-centred, occupation-based approaches, evidence of this integration is scarce. This systematic review explores occupational therapists' (OTs) knowledge and practices in oral health care and examines the barriers and facilitators to incorporating oral health care into their clinical practice. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across four databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), SCOPUS and EMBASE (Ovid). Studies were deemed eligible if they reported on OTs' knowledge and practices, as well as the barriers and facilitators to incorporating oral health into clinical practice. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and resolved discrepancies through team consultation. We assessed methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. We performed thematic analysis and reported the results in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: Of the 14,138 records screened, three qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. While these studies highlighted OTs' recognition of oral health's impact on daily living and their awareness of person-related challenges to oral hygiene, the relatively small number of included studies limits the generalisability of these findings. Reported practices included assessment, education, environmental modifications, and sensory strategies. Facilitators included prior therapist training, family-centred care and access to resources for oral health intervention. Barriers included limited oral health knowledge, insufficient training, systemic service gaps, lack of oral healthcare supplies and other resource constraints. Conclusion: This review suggests preliminary insights that OTs could potentially play a meaningful role in promoting oral health but are constrained by barriers at individual, organisational and systemic levels. Strengthening workforce training, interprofessional collaboration and policy support may help address oral health needs within occupational therapy practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.