ArticleBMJ public health2026
Inequalities in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance uptake in London: a UK multicentre cohort study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third-leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. 6 monthly ultrasound surveillance for HCC is recommended by professional bodies, but fewer than 25% of patients receive surveillance at recommended intervals. The aim of this study was to describe surveillance uptake across a multicentre cohort, examining sociodemographic factors and predictors of surveillance attendance. Methods: Electronic healthcare data from North West London primary care were used to identify numbers of patients with chronic liver disease between March 2021 and March 2023. A case review of patients eligible for HCC surveillance was then conducted using hospital care records. Data were collected including surveillance attendance and sociodemographic factors. Surveillance attendance was classified: regular (four surveillance episodes in 2 years), infrequent (less than four attendances) or non-attendance. Regression analysis was undertaken to examine factors associated with regular or reduced attendance. Results: 2195 patients were identified as having cirrhosis from primary care; 869 patients were identified from hospital care records as being under the care of hepatology/gastroenterology clinics and eligible for surveillance. Of these, 17% patients received regular surveillance; 73% of patients were in receipt of infrequent surveillance and 10% received no surveillance over the study period. The strongest predictor of regular surveillance was care under a specialist hospital (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.2, p<0.001). People who were not deprived were more likely to be regular attenders (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.8, p=0.008). Conclusions: Rates of regular HCC surveillance are low, with patients under the care of non-specialist centres most at risk of reduced attendance at surveillance. Our findings highlight the urgent need to address low surveillance uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.