ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
The natriuretic peptide blind spot in obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome in which obesity can influence both disease expression and diagnostic test performance. This editorial examines the clinical implications of low or apparently normal natriuretic peptide concentrations in obesity-related HFpEF. Published clinical and hemodynamic evidence indicates that some affected patients demonstrate pathological elevations in cardiac filling pressures, particularly during exercise, despite natriuretic peptide concentrations below conventional diagnostic thresholds. Although these patients may have less advanced structural disease and lower event rates than those with markedly elevated concentrations, they can still experience substantial functional limitation and worse outcomes than hemodynamically normal individuals. Reliance on fixed biomarker thresholds may therefore delay diagnosis and contribute to underrepresentation of this phenotype in clinical trials. Natriuretic peptides should remain central to HFpEF evaluation but should be interpreted in conjunction with the clinical phenotype, echocardiographic findings, validated probability scores, and selective exercise-based testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.