ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Social media's influence on rhinoplasty: the impact of digital platforms on nasal esthetics - a review.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social media has emerged as a major influence on contemporary perceptions of beauty and cosmetic surgery, particularly among younger populations. As one of the most commonly performed esthetic procedures worldwide, rhinoplasty has been increasingly affected by the widespread use of platforms such as Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube. This narrative review explores the influence of social media on rhinoplasty trends, patient motivations, expectations, psychological outcomes, and ethical considerations. Current evidence suggests that exposure to cosmetic surgery-related content, including before-and-after photographs, influencer endorsements, celebrity appearances, and filtered images, is associated with increased interest in rhinoplasty and more favorable attitudes toward cosmetic procedures. Social media also serves as an important source of information and facilitates communication between patients and surgeons, contributing to greater accessibility of esthetic services. However, repeated exposure to idealized and digitally enhanced images may contribute to unrealistic expectations, body dissatisfaction, appearance-related anxiety, and increased interest in cosmetic enhancement among susceptible individuals. Ethical concerns regarding patient confidentiality, informed consent, professionalism, and the responsible presentation of surgical outcomes have also become increasingly relevant in the digital era. While social media offers valuable opportunities for patient education and engagement, esthetic surgeons should prioritize ethical communication and realistic patient counseling. Further prospective, high-quality research is needed to better understand the long-term impact of social media on rhinoplasty decision-making and patient well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.