ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Elevated lipoprotein(a) and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is gaining attention as a potential marker for adverse pregnancy outcomes, in addition to its well-established role in cardiovascular disease. This review explores the evolving understanding of Lp(a) in pregnancy, focusing on its links to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, fetal growth restriction, and preterm birth, while also addressing diagnostic and management challenges. During pregnancy, Lp(a) levels rise substantially, nearly doubling between weeks 10 and 35. Although this increase is universal, its clinical implications are unclear. Lp(a) exerts pro-inflammatory, pro-thrombotic, and pro-atherogenic effects, the mechanisms of which are discussed in detail in the body of this review. However, research into Lp(a)'s specific role in increasing the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, has produced mixed results, highlighting the need for further investigation. Routine screening for Lp(a) during pregnancy is not standard practice, though some experts suggest that it could be beneficial, particularly for high-risk pregnant people. Similar to managing other cardiovascular disease risk factors, managing elevated Lp(a) during pregnancy requires a comprehensive approach, from preconception counseling to lifestyle adjustments such as improving diet, increasing physical activity, and quitting smoking. Pharmacological options like statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors have shown promise in non-pregnant populations, but their safety during pregnancy remains a concern, limiting their use. Further research is needed to clarify Lp(a)'s role in adverse pregnancy outcomes and to identify safe, effective treatments for managing elevated Lp(a) levels before and during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.